Answer:
The correct answer is Option "b. The value of the currency would increase"
Explanation:
The government through the central bank can adopt a variety of measures to control the amount of money supply in the economy. The state uses a combination of monetary and fiscal policies to this effect.
In the given example, the federal government would not print more money due to the implications it has not only on the value of the currency but also on other macroeconomic variables such as interest rates and inflation.
By printing money, there would be an excess amount of money supply in the economy. That would make each dollar in the economy worth less than what it was before. This puts downward pressure on interest rates and boosts inflation as well.
Due to higher inflation, a greater amount of money would be required to continue with normal business which would again cause the need to further increase money supply. Using the law of simple demand and supply, the value of money would keep lowering as money supply is kept increasing. This is why a government might elect to not print money.
Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
Hello :)
A chocolate bar tbh, probably more if we’re being honest.
Answer:
Marco polo was among the first Europeans to describe many of the advance technologies found in China.
Chattooga river , savannah river
