Answer:Supervisors who allow their rating in one area to influence their rating in another area on performance appraisals are susceptible to the <u><em>Halo effect.</em></u>
<em>Under halo effect the evaluator lets one or two feature of the appraisal or behavior of the worker unduly influence all other characteristic of the worker's performance. </em>
<u><em>Therefore in this case the correct option is (c).</em></u>
Answer:
19.82%
Explanation:
Midpoint method = Q2 - Q1 / [(Q2 + Q1) / 2] / P2 - P1 / [(P2+P1) / 2]
3.33 = 2000 - 1000 / [(2000 + 1000) / 2] / P2 - P1 / [(P2+P1)/2]
3.33 = 0.66 / (P2 - P1) / [(P2+P1)/2]
By cross multiplying we have
0.66 = 3.33 [ (P2 - P1) / [(P2+P1)/2]
divide both sides by 3.33
19.82% = The mid point change in price.
Complete Question:
The first two files attached contain the complete question
Answer:
Other file shows a step by step solution as follows
answer 1
answer2 etc
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The government sector derives its main incomes from taxes.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
