This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Ms. Coulter was successful using a token reinforcement system with Jordan to decrease his inappropriate behaviors in class. Mr. Johnson is now going to implement the same token system in his class in hope that Jordan's behavior will improve. This is an example of what generalization technique?
a. train loosely
b. sequentially modify
c. introduce to naturally maintaining contingencies
d. mediate generalization
Answer:
This is an example of:
b. sequentially modify
Explanation:
Sequential modification refers to the implementation of a certain system or procedure in different settings, expecting similar results to occur. For instance, a certain reinforcement system was applied at school. It generated a change in behavior at school, but not at home. Then, it is applied at home with the purpose of generating a change of behavior there as well. This is what we have in the passage provided. Mr. Johnson wishes to obtain the same or similar results to Ms. Coulter's by applying the same token reinforcement system.
While professional singers can command a pitch range of two octaves or more, an untrained voice is usually limited to about "An octave and a half".
<u>Answer:</u> Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
A musical interval between two notes or between one musical pitch and another with double its frequency, is called an octave. Like A3 to A4 is the interval of one octave. It is a natural mechanism popular as the "basic miracle of music" its application is well spread in most of the musical systems. The pitch in one or more than one octave can be calculated as follows:
For an instance, if one note has a frequency of 440 Hz
- One octave above has a pitch: 2 × 440 Hz = 880 Hz (A5).
- The frequency of two octaves above is: 2 x 880 Hz = 1760 Hz (A6).
- The note one octave below is at 220 Hz
- The ratio of frequencies of two notes an octave apart is hence 2:1.
I believe the answer is the first amendment.
The first amendment of United States both guaranteed the freeodom of speech and prohibit the establishment in making any regulations that only benefiit a ceratin religion.
The banning of evolution subject in school both violate the right to freedom of speech for the children and the free religion clause of the Students.
