I believe the last option is the correct one - <span>They were opposed to Article 10 that could infringe upon the United States’ right to declare war and expand its territories.
This particular Article meant that anyone could call America for assistance in times of war. Obviously, the US politicians were against such a decision, even though France and Britain wanted to sign it. In the end, nothing happened with this document.
</span>
Answer:
Connecticut Compromise, also known as Great Compromise, in United States history, the compromise offered by Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth during the drafting of the Constitution of the United States at the 1787 convention to solve the dispute between small and large states over representation.
I think rationing had both positive and negative impact on the morale in the country.
Explanation:
According to me rationing had both positive and negative impact because the people who had already less resources were forced to live without or even very less resources. They were already living were in the state of misery due to the lack of money and other things.
The process of rationing put pressure on them to have lesser resources. While the people who had the more financial power and more available resources learnt to live with the limited resources.
Kfkckcjckckckckckckckckckcjxbsbebdbx
Djcjcjcnckc
Answer: And God <u>said</u>, “<u>Let</u> there <u>be</u> light.”
Explanation:
In the given sentence, we have three verbs, including the auxiliary verb.
Our first verb is <em>said</em>, the past simple tense of the verb <em>to say</em>. Here it refers to the action performed by the subject - God.
The second verb is the auxiliary verb <em>let</em>, here used to form the third person imperative. To show that this indeed is the imperative mood, we could rephrase the sentence like this:<em> I command that there should be light.</em>
The third verb is <em>be</em>, also a part of the imperative mood in this sentence, referring to what light should do.
