Answer: reciprocity
Explanation: In simple words, reciprocity refers to the agreement in which two parties exchange goods or services in such a way that both of them will gain benefit from such agreement.
In business it can achieved in many ways, for example by combining the efforts and resources or by providing each other some service in exchange for service from the other side.
In the given case, Jason made a deal with dodge to provide service to him in exchange for service by him. Hence we can conclude that the given case depicts reciprocity.
Answer: c. $20,000
Explanation:
The Loss on Realization is monies accrued after assets have been sold off at less than their original value and in Calculating it, the following formula is used,
Loss on realization = Total Capital Balances after payment of liabilities minus - balance
Slotting in the figures therefore we have,
Loss on realization = $40,000 + $70,000 - $80,000
= $30,000 was the total loss on Realization
Seeing as Antonio and Barbara are partners who share income in the ratio of 1:2 we allocate to Barbara as follows,
Barbara = $30,000 * 2/(1+2)
= $20,000
Therefore option C is correct.
<h3>
Answer: D) increase in prices</h3>
An increase in prices will reduce demand, and not supply. You could have an increase in prices due to a shortage, but price increases could also be from a number of other factors, one of which is demand increasing.
Meanwhile, war, scarcity and extreme weather all are possible factors of a shortage. So we can cross choices A,B,C off the list.
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Assuming that you have the values for the year 2017, the break-even point would be 1500 units for the year 2017. To calculate this, we use the idea that at the breaking point, total sales is equal to the total cost or expenses made. Which would be:
selling (x) = fixed + variable (x)
x = fixed / (selling - variable)
x = 270000 / (600-420)
x = 1500 units