Answer:
Consider the following information for three stocks, A, B, and C. The stocks' returns are positively but not perfectly positively correlated with one another, i.e., the correlations are all between 0 and 1. Expected Standard Stock Return Deviation Beta
A 10% 20% 1.0
B 10% 10% 1.0
C 12% 12%1.4
Portfolio AB has half of its funds invested in Stock A and half in Stock B. Portfolio ABC has one third of its funds invested in each of the three stocks. The risk-free rate is 5%, and the market is in equilibrium, so required returns equal expected returns. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
Question 13 options:
a) Portfolio ABC's expected return is 10.66667% correct answer
. b) Portfolio AB has a standard deviation of 20%.
c)Portfolio ABC has a standard deviation of 20%.
d)Portfolio AB's required return is greater than the required return on Stock A.
e)Portfolio AB's coefficient of variation is greater than 2.0
Answer: Economic choices result in trade-offs.
Explanation:
The chart simply purports to show that when making economic decisions, you will have to accept trade-offs because resources are not infinite.
For instance, in order to expand, you will need to take on more financial risk. In that same vein, in order to serve more people, you will have to divide time between two stalls and might end up closing a stall.
Trade-offs simply have to be made.
Answer:
Complementary
Explanation:
The complementary resource is a term that describes a type of resources contributed by each partner to a business or investment. In other words, it is the resources each partner brings to the partnership that, when merged together, provide for new resources or capabilities that neither firm could readily create alone.
Hence, the right answer is COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES
Well if the muslims have any trade with us then that will most likely stop. most could be kicked out and that could start a riat. the economy would be bad but it will not be any worse than what he started with. he have been in the office for less than a week now and has already hit isis countless times. something obama never did. i would say trump's ban on muslims would cause a minor effect on the economy.
