All categories

3 years ago

Who is that please???

Business

2 answers:

gavmur [86]3 years ago

5 0

I see it, the dragon, yep its definitely there

Yakvenalex [24]3 years ago

4 0

The picture attached is not specific enough. Maybe you could elaborate on your question...

You might be interested in

On January 1, 2021, Laramie Inc. acquired land for $9.6 million. Laramie paid $2.9 in cash and signed a 6% note requiring the co

Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

$9.6 million

Explanation:

The amount Laramie would record in its books of account in respect of the land acquisition cost is the sum of the cash paid now and the notes payable .

That effectively gives acquisition cost of $9.6 million ($2.9 million+$6.7 million).

The interest payable on the notes payable of $6.7 million would be treated as expense in the income statement of years 2021 and 2022 respectively without being added to the acquisition cost since it is a revenue expense and should not be capitalized.

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose there is a large increase in the money supply in an economy that previously had low inflation. As a consequence, aggrega

hoa [83]

Answer:

It illustrates that the classical model of the price level best applies to economies with persistently high inflation.

Explanation:

When a very low inflation rate has been constant in an economy, and the money supply increases suddenly, in the short run that change will not immediately increase the inflation rate, but instead it will increase real output.

Classical economists argue that an increase in the money supply will immediately affect the inflation rate, but that theory applies mostly to economies that have a certain level of inflation. For example, for the past 12 years, European nations have been experiencing very low inflation rates, sometimes even negative rates. But during that same period, the European Central Bank has carried on a huge expansionary policy. It favored economic growth, although not as much as expected, but it didn't skyrocket inflation rate as the classical economy model predicted.

3 0

3 years ago

T-Bills are a security whose price can vary in the market where they are bought and sold after they are auctioned to the investi

natka813 [3]

Answer:

C. What you earn on this security would not change as a result of the change in interest rates.

Explanation:

The increase in the interest rate will decrease the price of the T-Bill if you want to sell it to another investor, but what you will earn with the security will not change at all. Your earnings in dollars = interest rate paid by the T-Bill or any other type of bond.

If you buy and sell securities for a living, then a change in the interest rates can make you win or lose money, since the price of the securities will increase or decrease. If interest rates increase, the price decreases. But if you invest on a security to earn the coupon or interest rate that it pays, a change in the price will not affect you because you already own it. The opportunity cost of holding the security might change, but the accounting revenues will not.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a disadvantage of a market economy?a. consumer satisfaction is lowb. it limits freedom for producers a

patriot [66]

Answer: The correct answer is c) It does not provide for everyoned.

Explanation:

In a market economy, the problem is that we are not born with the same opportunities, nor the possibility of accessing the same factors of production, nor are we equally qualified in all fields. That is, those who are born in a family with less economic resources, or simply are not enabled in activities that have more benefits, are at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the individuals. These inequalities end up generating inequalities in income distribution.

4 0

3 years ago

You and your friends want to buy a condo at the beach to time share. Each of you has single peaked preferences with a most prefe

Gemiola [76]

Answer:

Individual Cost Shares to be enjoyed

Mabel $10,000 10000 / 150000 = 6.67%

Gertrude $20000 20000 / 150000 = 13.3%

Myron $30000 30000 / 150000 = 20%

Wilber $40000 40000 / 150000 = 26.6%

You $50000 50000 / 150000 = 33.3%

Explanation:

peaked preferences

Most preferred value to spend :

Mabel = $10,000

Gertrude = $20,000

Myron = $30,000

Wilber = $40,000

you = $50,000

cost of Condo = $150,000

<u>Implementing a Uniform rule mechanism to allocate costs and shares </u>

The uniform rule ; ∑ j∈I Uj (p) = Ω.

where Ω = fixed amount of resource

hence the summation of all allotment should = Ω ( $150,000 )

Number of friends = 5

cost of condo = $150,000

If divide equally each person will have to pay ; $150,000 / 5 = $30,000

Total money to be spent by friends = 10,000 + 20,000 + 30,000 + 40,000 + 50,000 = $150,000

Individual Cost shares to be enjoyed

Mabel $10,000 10000 / 150000 = 6.67∑%

Gertrude $20000 20000 / 150000 = 13.3%

Myron $30000 30000 / 150000 = 20%

Wilber $40000 40000 / 150000 = 26.6%

You $50000 50000 / 150000 = 33.3%

∑shares ≈ 100% ( 150,000 )

6 0

3 years ago