<span>The permanent income is the factor most needed to understand how much can be bought. This figure gives a relative basis for figuring out the average amount of goods and services a person can purchase over a given time frame. The larger the permanent income, the larger the basket of goods and services available to them.</span>
FALSE. Directive leadership is thought to be less effective when employees have low levels of ability.
If employees have low levels of ability this is when they need directive leadership.
Based on the fact that Falz failed to make the purchase, Grain Farm most likely has the remedy of C ) Pay the difference between contract price and market price.
<h3>What is Grain farm to do?</h3>
When a buyer (Falz) gets into an agreement to buy a land or property and fails to do so, this falls under real estate and damage.
Under real estate and damage, the buyer would then have to pay the seller (Grain Farm) a remedy which would be the difference between the market price of the property and the contract price.
Options for this question include:
- the amount that Faiz expected to invest in the brewery
- a percentage of Faiz's unrealized profit.
- the difference between the contract and market prices of the land.
- nothing-Grain Farm still owns the land.
Find out more on contract remedy at brainly.com/question/28480342
#SPJ1
Answer:
$10 profit
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate the profit or loss to a short position.
Firstly, we identify that the spot price of market index is $900.
Now, a three months forward contract equals a value of $930.
Raising the index to $920 at the expiry date is obviously a profit to the short position.
To calculate the profit here, we simply subtract the index at expiry date from the three months forward contract.
Mathematically, this is equal to $930-$920 = $10 profit
Answer:
a. 19.750 b. 138.250
Explanation:
A. We divide 158.000 by 8 to get the amount per year
158.000/8= 19.750
- Amortization expense (Db) 19.750
- Accumulated amortization (Cr) 19.750
B. On the balance sheet at the end of the first year, we would subtract those 19.750 to the gross value of the patent and the value of the patent would be
158.000 - 19.750 = 138.250
<u><em>Net carrying amount of the patent:</em></u><em> 138.250</em>
