The main way in which the poem, "The White Man's Burden", justifies imperialism to the industrialized world and the unindustrialized world is that it implies that it is the "obligation" and duty of white men in developed and rich countries to colonies poorer countries--in order to implement more "modern" and prosperous forms of government.
Freedom of religion is a substantive right protected by the Bill of Rights. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". The Bill of Rights is actually the collective name that is given to the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution. I hope this has helped you.
Answer:
The answer is: No it wasn't.
Explanation:
The economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict.
Main reasons:
States' rights-They wanted to avoid federal laws, especially laws interfering with the South's right to keep slaves and take them wherever they wished
Territorial expansion--the newly formed Republican party, whose members were strongly opposed to the westward expansion of slavery into new states
Secession--They felt excluded from the political system , and decided to withdraw themselves. All these led to war.
The order of appearance on Earth is:
First ___ Australopithecines
Second ___Homo habilis
Third ___ Homo erectus
Fourth ____ Neanderthals
Fifth ____ Homo sapiens
Australopithecines appeared on Earth about 5.6 million years ago and lived there until about 1.2 million years ago.
Homo habilis appeared on Earth about 2.4 million years ago and lived in Africa until about 1.6 million years ago.
Homo Erectus appeared on Earth about 2 million years ago and lived in Africa and Asia about 70,000 years ago.
Homo Neanderthalensis appeared on Earth about 230,000 ago and lived in Europe and Asia until about 40,000 years ago.
Homo Sapiens appeared on Earth about 200,000 years ago and still live on Earth.
Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:
After listing the numerous powers granted to Congress by the Constitution the author says:
My object is to consider that undefined, unbounded and immense power which is comprised in the following clause: “And to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the United States; or in any department or offices thereof.” Under such a clause as this, can anything be said to be reserved and kept back from Congress? ...
In giving such immense, such unlimited powers, was there no necessity of a Bill of Rights, to secure to the people their liberties? Is it not evident that we are left wholly dependent on the wisdom and virtue of the men who shall from time to time be the members of Congress? And who shall be able to say seven years hence, the members of Congress will be wise and good men, or of the contrary character?
Answer:
The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
Explanation:
For the author, the constitution is highly powerful, since it has the capacity to possess immense, unlimited and indefinite power. This is a concern for the population of the country, because nothing guarantees that all this relevance will not be used for evil.
The power of the constitution is managed by those who administer it, the congressmen. No one guarantees that the members of the Congress are and will be just and good people, who will use all the power of the constitution for good.
