Ticket for a pantomime cost $80 for children. A party of 25 pays $143 in total. how many adults were there in the party?
can anyone answer this?
can anyone answer this
Answer:
i think the second option
Step-by-step explanation:
follow me on my insta a.cc.o.u.n.t below
<h2>
<em><u>"</u></em><em><u>A</u></em><em><u>T</u></em><em><u>T</u></em><em><u>I</u></em><em><u>C</u></em><em><u>U</u></em><em><u>S</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>S</u></em><em><u>W</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u>T</u></em><em><u>L</u></em><em><u>O</u></em><em><u>V</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u>R</u></em><em><u>"</u></em></h2>
Answer:
B. The evidence is very strong - there is NO difference in the proportion of Republicans between the two areas of town.
Step-by-step explanation: Generally, a p-value of less than 0.05 is described as a strong evidence in favour of the null hypothesis. A p-value also known as the probability value is also known to provide the smallest level of evidence at which the null hypothesis would be rejected.
In the question, The p-value is 0.105 which is bigger in value than 0.05 which means there is no significant difference between the evidence and the null hypothesis.
To find the inverse, interchange the variables and solve for y.
f^-1 (x) = 4 + x/2