Answer:
Cities like Boston and New Amsterdam have grown rapidly to large cities because of the large number of English immigrants.
Explanation:
Boston became big due to the large number of immigrants, mainly English. This caused the city to expand and become a great cultural and economic center, since trade was something very dynamic, diverse and productive in this region.
New Amsterdam, on the other hand, did not have as many immigrants when it was under Dutch rule. That's because Holland was economically well, at that time, so few Dutch people were willing to be colonists in the Americas. However, this region had a strong trade, mainly for furs. In relation to immigration, this scenario changed when this territory came to be dominated by England, which attracted a large number of immigrants.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Canada is a great country. Indeed, a country with a great quality of life. That is why many immigrants want to go to Canada, to improve their living conditions.
Canada’s immigration policies reflect the underlying values of its citizens and impact Canadian history because these policies reflect the Canadian values that welcome people and support diversity as long as immigrants understand that they have to respect Canadian laws and the culture, traditions, history, and beliefs systems of this nation.
Canada has welcomed immigrant workers when the country has labor shortages and needs specific skills for workers, for instance, in agriculture.
<span>This is false. Concepts of reasoning and belief (as brought about by being taught about these ideas by elders and other authority figures) are hugely linked to how messages are seen and interpreted. Two cultures that put importance on completely different ideas can take the same message and interpret it as a friendly notion or a grave threat.</span>
Answer:
There are many examples of fossils found on separate continents and nowhere else, suggesting the continents were once joined. If Continental Drift had not occurred, the alternative explanations would be: The species evolved independently on separate continents – contradicting Darwin's theory of evolution.
