Answer:
$133,000
Explanation:
We can find Pete's total contribution to GDP by adding up the following numbers:
$87,000 worth of pizzas - because finished goods are part of GDP
$39,000 paid to employees - because wages are part of GDP
$5,000 paid in taxes - taxes are part of GDP because they are government revenue
$2,000 of inventories at the end of year - end-of-year inventories are included in GDP
Therefore: $87,000 + $39,000 + $5,000 + $2,000 = $133,000
the $11,000 worth of ingredients are not included in GDP because GDP only accounts for finished goods and services.
Increasing ,increasing
the reason is that when the economy is
growing more money is flowing ,unemployment is decreasing so more goods
and services are produced ,as a result of low unemployment ,more
consumption and total output increasing total income is increasing
Answer: B. Fundamental weighting.
Explanation:
A fundamentally weighted index refers to a type of equity index whereby the components that are chosen based on the fundamental criteria like the dividend rates, book value, revenue, dividend rates, etc.
Fundamental weighting is the index weighting which results in portfolio weights shifting away from securities that have increased in relative value toward securities that have fallen in relative value whenever the portfolio is rebalanced.
Answer:
difference between supplies = $4.68
Explanation:
cost of merchandise from manufacturer if paid within discount period:
$1,200 x (1 - 40%) = $720
$720 x (1 - 10%) = $648
freight cost = $648 x 2.5% = $16.20
discount for early payment = $648 x 2% = $12.96
total cost = $651.24
cost of merchandise from wholesaler if paid within discount period:
$1,200 x (1 - 40%) = $720
$720 x (1 - 8%) = $662.40
discount for early payment = $648 x 1% = $6.48
total cost = $655.92
difference between supplies = $4.68
Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.
Explanation:
The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.
Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.
