Answer:
the British preferred to use local institutions to control subject populations.
Explanation:
British colonialism was established differently in places that had already established their own institutions, such as African countries. Although these countries already had institutions before the arrival of the English, it was necessary that the British empire dominate these institutions, or to give them up and form new institutions. However, the British empire understood that dominating existing institutions would be something cheaper and more advantageous and that it would establish an efficient dominance, so it was done, that is, unlike other European nations, England decided to use local institutions to control populations subdued.
<h3><u>Question</u><u>:</u></h3>
<em>This man tried to modernize the USSR prior to the end of the Cold War in the 1980s. </em>
<h3><u>Answer</u><u>:</u></h3>
<em><u>C</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Mikhail</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Gorbachev</u></em>
worked to liberalize and restructure the country. His policies opened the door to rapid changes in Eastern Europe and in Soviet-American relations at the end of the 1980s.
CarryOnLearning ૮₍˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶₎ა
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The US is an indirect democracy due
That is because the lords were the owners of the land where they lived. Villages were usually found on land owned by lords who answered to the kings of the entire region. The lords would provide protection from foreign incursions but in return the people would give the lord things like manufactured goods or produce or similar things.