The government which replaced the tsar had to share power with the ____.

History

1 answer:

taurus [48]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Provisional government which replaced the Tsar had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet.

Explanation:

During the Russian Revolution of 1917 the Provisional government shared power with the Petrograd Soviet (council). The latter comprised of workers and soldiers (lower class people and the political left) who pressured the 'bourgeois' provisional government.
To share power the Provisional government faced lots of challenges due to political factionalism and division of state structures.
The Petrograd Soviet which cooperated with the government to controled the railway, factories and the military. While the provisional government held state power.

You might be interested in

HELP PLEASE FAST!!!! Read the following passage written by Charles de Montesquieu. Which ideals

gavmur [86]

The awnser should be c

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did the younger queen appoint Phattejung in the post of the<br>Mukhtiyar?

rjkz [21]

Answer:

King Rajendra was insulted and his trusted bodyguard was beheaded. His junior wife, Queen Rajyalakshmi, had thought that Jung Bahadur Rana would help her to ensure that her son Prince Ranendra succeeds to the throne but Jung Bahadur had made her believe so for his own motives.

As he was an infant, his mother Rajendra Lxmi shah ruled as a regent. Relationship between Bahadur Shah and Rajendra Laxmi was not so good. So Bahadur Shah went to live in India. He returned to Nepal after the death of Rajendra Laxmi and started to rule as the regent of his nephew Rana Bahadur Shah.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Anyone know what this is? Need to know ASAP!!!

Alexxx [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

it is covered in the first amendment in the constitution

8 0

3 years ago

which global impacts (russian revolution, sykes-picot agreement, french conscription law) of WWI had the biggest effect on world

-Dominant- [34]

Russian Revolution had the biggest effect

7 0

3 years ago

Under what circumstances, to Locke, might it be necessary for the people to dissolve their government and start anew? Be detaile

otez555 [7]

Locke believed that it was necessary for the people to dissolve their government whenever it became tyrannical; for instance if a small group of elite people were making decisions without the consent of the electorate. This was highly influential to Jefferson and the Founders prior to the American Revolution.

5 0

3 years ago