Answer:
redlining
Explanation:
Redlining is an illegal banking practice that focuses on neighborhoods that are mostly inhabited by minorities. The term redlining itself comes from the practice of marking neighborhoods on city maps with red lines to represent them as dangerous both for banking purposes and high crime rates.
Banks cannot directly deny a credit based on where you live, but they can charge very high interest rates that make them very difficult to pay, or simply ask for a lot of paperwork and more requirements than usual.
Answer:
Negative reinforcement
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement is a behavioral psychology principle that occur when one's action allows him / her to escape an unfavorable action before it occurs.
It is mentioned in the scenario that Sheppad is being bullied and criticized by Alexandra , being the boss's sister .
Susan's idea of completing all work including the extras is a behavior intentionally put up to escape the constant unpleasant stimuli from Sheppad.
Answer:
$45,800
Explanation:
Coronado Industries
Cost of Equipment $762,00
Accumulated Depreciation
( $762,000 - 45,000 ) /10*9 years
=$717,000/10×9 years
=71,700×9 years
=$645,300
Therefore Dec 31,2012 book value of equipment will be:
= $762,000 - $645,300
= $116,700
Equipment sold $162,500
The gain to be recognize will be
= $162,500 - $116,700
= $45,800
1 January ,2012 to 31 December,2020 will give us 9 years
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
