Answer:
There will be a difference in the income .
Absorption costing income will be lower as it transfers all the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
Variable costing income will be higher as it does not transfer the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
The difference will be of $ 104000
Explanation:
Increase in units 8000
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24.00 $10.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 8.00 3.00
Total Unit Costs $ 32.00 $ 13.00
The net operating income under variable costing for the year will be $ 13* 8000= $ 104000 Lower than the net operating income under absorption costing. This is because the all fixed costs will be treated as period cost rather than product costs.
In variable costing the ending inventory will be $104000 lower than the ending inventory under absorption costing because the fixed costs will not be allocated to products.
Under variable costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32 each.Under absorption costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32+ $ 13= $ 45 each.
The company plays $33,500 to tear down the old buildingand $47,000 to landscapethe lot. It also pays a total of $1,540,000 in construction costs-this amount consists of $1,452,200 for the new building and $87,800 for lighting andpaving a parking areanext to the building. Prepare a single journal entry to record thesecosts incurred by Cala, all of which are paid in cash.Cost of LandPurchase price for land$280,000Purchase price for old building$110,000Demolition costs for an old building $33,500Fill and level the land$47,000Total cost of land$470,500Cost of New building and land improvementsCost of new building$1,452,200Cost of land improvements<span>$87,800</span>
These are examples of D. documentation
Hope this helps!
Answer:
$3,135 unfavorable
$9,937.50 unfavorable
Explanation:
The formula and the computation of the direct labor price and efficiency variance is shown below:
Direct labor price variance
= (Standard rate - Actual rate) × Actual hours of production
= ($15- $145,600 ÷ 9,500 hours ) × 9,500 labor hour worked
= ($15 - $15.33) × 9,500 labor hour worked
= $3,135 unfavorable
Labor efficiency variance is
= (Actual production - standard production) × standard rate per unit
= (6,600 units - 9,500 hours ÷ 1.6 hours) × $15
= (6,600 units - 5,937.0) × $15
= $9,937.50 unfavorable
Since the actual hours is more than the standard one so it would lead to unfavorable variance
