1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
2 years ago
11

All of the following statements about James Hogg are true EXCEPT: a. He helped pass laws that enforced fair business practices.

b. One of his most important achievements was the creation of the Texas Railroad Commission. c. One of his main goals was the success of big business. d. He was the first native-born governor of Texas. Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
History
1 answer:
Anna007 [38]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The one that IS NOT true is option C.

Explanation:

He did not have a main goal as a successful business. He didn't care about it.

You might be interested in
Why did many slaves and freedmen ally themselves with the British cause during the American Revolution?
mezya [45]

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

They hoped Great Britain would make them British citizens if they agreed to fight against colonial independence.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0
3 years ago
What kind of relationship did the soviet union have with the united states in 1945 apex?
padilas [110]
It was a good one in fact, They were good allies in WWII despite one being capitalist (USA) and the other communist (USSR). Their relationships weakened after WWII.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is the Roman Code idea that people should be ruled by laws rather
Korvikt [17]

Answer:

This idea of the Roman code is currently reflected in the USA through the federal constitution.

Explanation:

The relevance of the federal constitution today within American society reinforces the idea that people should be governed by laws rather than by the whims of leaders. This is because the constitution has the ability to establish all laws that need to be followed and obeyed within the country, in addition to limiting the power of the leaders, preventing them from governing the country according to their whims and not according to the law and the order.

6 0
3 years ago
In what ways did hostility grow between the colonists and the King?
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

The kind believed had the right to tax the colonists, many colonists felt they should not pay these taxes, because they wete passed in england by parliament and not by their own colonial government. They said the taxes violated their right as british citizens. Also by the 1770s many colonists were angry bc they did not have self-government. That meant they could not govern themselvesand make their own laws. Almost no colonists wanted to be independent of britain at the time bc britain provided protection, yet all of them valued their rights as british citizens and the idea of local self-rule.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between criminal law and civil law? Criminal law protects society from wrongdoers, while civil law settle
    5·2 answers
  • Which describes Hammurabi's Code? A. the first set of laws that treated all people equally B. a set of rules for governing that
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a natural right? the rights that are given under specific circumstances the rights that are granted to
    10·1 answer
  • What were the British responses to South Carolina?<br> ?
    15·1 answer
  • What was hieroglyphics and who invented it
    8·1 answer
  • Which goods did Great Britain pass a direct tax on that led to boycotts and a group of delegates to meet to determine how to pro
    15·2 answers
  • How did the 1965 Hart-Celler Act change immigration to the United States? Using complete sentences, explain how this act ended o
    5·1 answer
  • What are some facts about China and its economy? GRAP(E)S.
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPP
    7·2 answers
  • In the space below, describe the political contributions of Susan B. Anthony, Lucretia Mott, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. How did
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!