The fraud at healthsouth at the structural level of the company was more intense because checks and balances were eliminated and organizational culture was compromised
The HealthSouth fraud took place in an intriguing time of economic expansion and lax laws, which made accounting fraud considerably simpler. Investors and lenders were more concerned with revenue in the 1990s than they were with profitability. Growth was important when a company was asking for funding. CEOs were under pressure, including Scrushy, to maintain company growth and consistently above analyst predictions. Along with this increased demand for growth, there emerged an odd legal climate.
The HealthSouth CFOs (described as: filling "holes" in the balance sheet with "dirt") changed their earnings figures. The fraud went unnoticed until 2003, when Weston Smith, a former HealthSouth CFO, told federal authorities about it. It involved inappropriately capitalizing spending, overestimating insurance reimbursements, overvaluing fixed assets, and employing flawed reserve accounting.
To learn more about fraud click here:
brainly.com/question/14971645
#SPJ4
Answer:
The establishment of social welfare programs.
Explanation:
This is the answer for Ap3x.
Answer:
net income $72,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be reported is shown below:
Revenue $600,000
less:
operating expense -$420,000
restructing costs -$100,000
interest expense -$20,000
Add: gain on sale of investments $30,000
EBIT $90,000
less income tax at 20% - $18,000
net income $72,000
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
As mentioned, it is necessary to know that the employee who enters a new company does so under a series of basic skills and knowledge that must be improved and increased over time, so a system based on knowledge and skills must recognize the effort of workers to specialize in their tasks effectively, performing their duties in a committed, fast and quality manner.
