The answer is series 7 which is for investment agents <span>who want to sell </span>fixed-income<span> investment products such as bonds, stocks, and packaged products.</span>
Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
The false statement about cover letters is that: C. a cover letter is sent before a résumé so that the employer knows it is coming.
<h3>What is a
cover letter?</h3>
A cover letter can be defined as a type of letter that is attached as an introduction and it generally accompanies another document such as a résumé.
This ultimately implies that, the false statement about cover letters is saying it's sent before a résumé to an employer of labor, so he or she knows it is coming.
Read more on cover letters here: brainly.com/question/24136973
#SPJ1
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
a. specialty-line wholesalers.
b. assemblers.
c. full-service stockers.
d. in-store maintainers.
e. rack jobbers.
And this is the correct answer:
c. full-service stockers.
Explanation:
Fiona is a full-service stocker, or retail stocker. A retail stocker is a person who is responsible for organizing (stocking) products in the shelves of a retail space (a large store, a supermarket, a convenience store).
Retail stocker also help customers by giving directions within the store, or by helping elderly, disabled, and other people reach products that they might not be able to reach by themselves.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
the airport would be liable because the fire truck blowing a tire and hitting the pole was the direct cause. not the failure of the landing gear
