Answer:
Option B sounds the best if an area or region of countries is already having a lot of tension against one another then this sounds more likely to start an arms race.
Explanation:
This has happened in the past many times.
Please Mark as Brainliest
Hope this Helps
The answer to this question is 28%.
As a nation of immigrants, united States host the most diverse group of people in the world.
Over several years, the immigrants have become a crucial part of our society, but the number is predicted to come down due to development of technology that allow workers to do their job remotely.
You didn't list options, so I'll simply give some history here.
When President Ronald Reagan came into office in 1981, he took a hard stance toward the Soviet Union. Where previous leaders of the nations had pursued detente and nuclear arms reduction, Reagan spoke of the Soviet Union as the "evil empire" and, in 1983, proposed a major new space-based missile defense program, the Strategic Defense initiative.
But in 1985, the positions of the two countries began to shift again. In March 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev proposed policies of perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness) in the Soviet Union. In November 1985, Reagan and Gorbachev met in person for the first of several summit meetings they would have, and developed a personal relationship.
In 1987, Reagan gave a speech in Berlin (a city divided between democratic West Berlin and communist East Berlin). In that speech he issued a famous personal appeal to Gorbachev, saying:
- <em>We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace. There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!</em>
Answer:
its either b or c
Explanation:
primary sources are real evidence, like the actual document of the constitution, not a copy of it.
