Answer:
The United States Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2). Treaties are binding agreements between nations and become part of international law.
At times, it was chaotic because it was so much land to control that the ruler split it into "states", and gave each one to a family member. But, after a while they realized some of the family had more land than others, so they began to fight. The bigger lands conquered the others with their stronger army.
The correct answer is B) appealed the Florida Supreme Court’s decision to allow a hand recount.
Following the 2000 presidential election, the Bush campaign appealed to the Florida Supreme Court’s decision to allow a hand recount.
One of the most controversial US presidential elections in modern times was the George W. Bush vs. Al Gore election of 2000. The election was to be decided in the state of Florida, where the candidate's Bush brother was the governor of the state. The results of the election were so close in the state of Florida, that Al Gore's campaign asked for a hand recount of the ballots. That is when the Bush campaign appealed to the Florida Supreme Court’s decision to allow a hand recount. The court decision was to suspend the hand count of the ballots.
Having background information about political parties and their candidates.
Knowing that your vote counts.
Keeping in mind the effects of voting for a specific candidate.
Knowing the voting system followed by the country.
:-)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the author’s experience of his society.
No, I don't agree with this statement because I consider that in order to truly understand the primary source, a good researcher has to understand the circumstance and the time in which the primary source was created.
This means, if it was during a war or a revolutionary period, the researcher has to understand and think as the author of the source did.
ANd I am clear using my words: understand. Not biasing the records, the facts, or misinterpret the situation, the context, or the facts.