Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
7 with exp 3 times 9 with exp 4 minus 2=
343 times 6561 minus 2=
2250421
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Isolate the term of n from one side of the equation.
<h3>n-1/8=3/8</h3>
<u>First, add by 1/8 from both sides.</u>
n-1/8+1/8=3/8+1/8
<u>Solve.</u>
<u>Add the numbers from left to right.</u>
3/8+1/8=4/8
<u>Common factor of 4.</u>
4/4=1
8/4=2
<u>Rewrite as a fraction.</u>
=1/2
n=1/2
<u>Divide is another option.</u>
1/2=0.5
n=1/2=0.5
- <u>Therefore, the final answer is n=1/2=0.5.</u>
I hope this helps you! Let me know if my answer is wrong or not.
Answer:
22, 19, 16 and - 5
Step-by-step explanation:
To evaluate any term from the n th term formula substitute the terms position value for n
given 
= 25 - 3n, then
(a)
= 25 - (3 × 1) = 25 - 3 = 22
= 25 - (3 × 2) = 25 - 6 = 19
= 25 - (3 × 3) = 25 - 9 = 16
(b)
= 25 - (3 × 10) = 25 - 30 = - 5
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
