All categories

3 years ago

The larger of two numbers is 10 less than 5 times the smaller.their sum is 146 .find the smaller number

Mathematics

1 answer:

ExtremeBDS [4]3 years ago

5 0

For this problem, you would have to use a system of equations. Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

Natalie's family drank 0.9 of the 2.6 liters of the lemonade she made for a picnic. how much lemonade did her family drink? Show

rewona [7]

Answer:

There is 1.7 left

Step-by-step explanation:

2.6 - 0.9 = 1.7

5 0

2 years ago

Which statement is true about ∠1 and ∠2?

gavmur [86]

Answer: Most likely A

Step-by-step explanation:

the reason I say its A is because of the face that congruent means in line not and straight. Though in your answer it shows that they are not alined so that leaves us with complemantary and the 2 complementary answer choices are

A & C but C is wrong because it say alternate which also means the that they would be 2 different angels so yeah I'm gonna go for A.

Good luck :)

5 0

2 years ago

What is -3(2x-4)+9x-8

professor190 [17]

Answer:

3x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Tim Hortons is hiring and offers $200 every week plus $5 per hour. McDonalds offers $300 every week plus $2 per hour. State the

Bogdan [553]

Answer: After working for 33 $\frac{1}{3}$ hours a week

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us write equations to represent these two places. Let x be hours worked and y be money earned.

Tim Hortons:

$200 + $5x = y

McDonalds:

$300 + $2x = y

Now, to find the conditions of which Tim Hortons is the better employer (on the basis of money earned) we must find the interval that Tim Hortons pays more. This can be found by setting up another equation, or by graphing. I have shown both. See attached for the graph.

$200 + $5x > $300 + $2x

$5x > $100 + $2x

$3x > $100

x > $\frac{100}{3}$

x > 33.3334

Tim Hortons is the better employer after an employee has worked for 33 $\frac{1}{3}$ hours a week.

Read more about this question here:

brainly.com/question/24206551

8 0

1 year ago

Choose the congruence theorem that you would use to prove the triangles congruent.

Elena L [17]

Answer:

SAS

Explanation:

Before solving the problem, let's define each of the given theorems:

1- SSS (side-side-side): This theorem is valid when the three sides of the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second triangle

2- SAS (side-angle-side): This theorem is valid when two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle

3- ASA (angle-side-angle): This theorem is valid when two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle

4- AAS (angle-angle-side): This theorem is valid when two angles and a side that is not included between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and a side that is not included between them in the second triangle

Now, let's check the given triangles:

We can note that the two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle

This means that the two triangles are congruent by SAS theorem

Hope this helps :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers