The cells of the immune system
Answer:
a) No; b) Yes; c) Down
Explanation:
a) No: Rotenone inhibits the transfer of electrons from complex I to CoQ of the electron chain by inhibiting the oxidation of NADH to NAD.
b) Yes: Besides receiving electrons from complex I, FADH2 receives electrons from fatty acids and glycerol-3-phosphate. 2 ATPs are produced from FADH2.
c) Down: Less oxygen will be broken down (or consumed) to water, instead some of it will be converted to reactive oxygen species.
Answer:
Explanation:
Law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Thus, in relation to the question, as the object slides down the ramp, the kinetic energy should increase at the same rate the potential energy is reducing in such a way that the kinetic energy of the object at the bottom of the ramp should be equal to the potential energy of the object at the top of the ramp (since the energy was been "transferred" as the object moved). However, this situation only occurs, as explained, in the absence of friction. <u>In the presence of friction, some of the energy is used to overcome friction as the object moves down the ramp and as such there is an energy loss due to friction in the process which makes the kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp not equal to the potential energy at the top. This also does not violate the law of conservation of energy since no energy was destroyed in the process (as all the energy involved can be accounted for)</u>.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
I believe it would be C.
The tree is just starting to get flowers, nut its already come out of the ground and so its not in the seed stage, and it does not have bark yet so it cant be an adult tree
Answer:
There can be alternate explanations for the same evidence
Explanation:
The geology and the biology are two different scientific fields, thus the geologists and biologists have different focus and viewpoints when examining something. When a same experiment is done by scientists from two different fields, it is very likely that the conclusions would be different. The main reason for this is that both of them will have different view and methods to come to the conclusion, as their focus is on different things, or at least the approach is different.
