Answer:
a good leader should be tolerant and understanding of others people circumstances and needs. they should always be frank and honest with whoever they're leading. being fair and just are also two very admirable traits you find in a good leader.
Answer: Beowulf is sympathetic to the humans, while Grendel shows the monster’s perspective; Beowulf is a contemporary version of an old tale, while Grendel is based on oral tradition.
Explanation:
Both works are written in an Old English poetic style: There is just one work - <u>Beowulf;</u>
<u></u>
Beowulf characterizes Grendel as bloodthirsty, but Grendel shows Grendel’s gentler side. - Grendel is a monster;
<u></u>
Beowulf is sympathetic to the humans, while Grendel shows the monster’s perspective. Yes, it is a monster;
Both works focus primarily on the hero, Beowulf. - There is just one work - <u>Beowulf;</u>
Beowulf is a contemporary version of an old tale, while Grendel is based on oral tradition. - Beowulf is the hero of the work; Grendel in Norse mythology, Grendel is a monstrous character.
Had no place to stay nearby.
Real old, abandoned mansion.
There was a tumble-down plantation house on the hill.
Seemed to John he'd heard the place was haunted.
Seemed to John he'd heard the place was haunted.
In "Better Wait Till Martin Comes," when the cats repeatedly pick up red hot coals,
it proves that the cats are ordinary and will not harm John.
it distracts the reader from worrying about Martin's arrival.
it builds suspense by showing that the cats are fearless.
it calms the reader by repeating a familiar action.
it builds suspense by showing that the cats are fearless.
A adjective because "The true king of the beasts is the elephant" is describing the elephant
The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
