Answer:
I cant help if there is no passage to read. I wont understand the question.
Answer:
Explanation:
"A Jury of Her Peers'' was written by Susan Glaspell. She employs a narrative tone to describe the story. The resolution forms part of the story and it's where the story ends. It is at this point that conflicts are resolved and the story comes to an end. The plot was considered as a feminist literature because two female characters were trying to come up with a solution to a mystery. Mrs Hale and Mrs Peters came up with the conclusion that Mrs Wright killed her husband, and her actions are justified. The circumstances behind the death of John Wright leaves the townsmen in a state of confusion as to what could have led to his death. Mrs Wright killed her husband because she was physically abused by her. Mrs Hale and Mrs Peters hide the evidence against her because they understand how it feels to be humiliated and oppressed by a man. In the end, Mrs Wright is granted freedom.
Answer:
Yes!
Explanation:
I think this is a good problem for society because if there were no racism, then George Floyd wouldn't have died and the black lives matter wouldn't happen. I also think there wouldn't be a mob on the capitol if there were no racism today! BLACK LIVES MATTER!
Answer:
The Frog Prince magically transforms into a handsome prince. In the original Grimm version of the story the frog's spell was broken when the princess threw it against a wall in disgust, while in modern versions the transformation is triggered by the princess kissing the frog.
Explanation:
~AJTHESHOOTER...
