Answer:
The Corwin Amendment was a proposed amendment to the Constitution passed by Congress and sent to the states for ratification in 1861. Had it been ratified, the Corwin Amendment would have prohibited the federal government from abolishing enslavement in the states where it existed at the time.
I believe this would be Upper paleolithic because the creation of the tools and using them would quickly help them to establish the Neolithic era creating tools out of metal rather than stone.
There was plenty of good land available for farming
Answer:
Explanation:
In general terms, a radical is one who wants “root and branch” change (Latin: Radix, a root), based on the sense of certainty that a set of principles should be applied, principles that run counter to those involved in the status quo.
Its true opposite is conservative. A classic conservative is very wary of drastic change based on a set of a priori principles, because given the fallen state of man, and the fallibility of human reason, it is better to retain at least those elements of things as they are that are sort of working. Given the horrors released by many revolutions, there is a lot of empirical evidence to support this view.
Mexico, the german government thought this lead to war with the U.S
