1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kkurt [141]
3 years ago
11

What was the result of “Bleeding Kansas”?

History
2 answers:
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D. Popular sovereignty was an unworkable solution for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska.

Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

<h2>Popular sovereignty was an unworkable solution for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska.</h2>

Explanation:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery.  In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.

After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred.  The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed that occurred in this situation.  The move to make slavery a popular sovereignty matter proved to be unworkable and hurtful.

You might be interested in
What it was like living hiding during world war 2 while nazis were in power
aivan3 [116]
It was absolutely horrible
5 0
3 years ago
Someone who supported ratification of the constitution, believed that the president should have a lot of power, and held a loose
baherus [9]
Federalists believed that the central government should be strong and have a lot of power. They held a loose interpretation of the Constitution, meaning they believed that, if the Constitution didn't say you couldn't do something, you could do it.
5 0
3 years ago
Differences and similarities of both early and modern humans
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

Early Man: Early man refers to the early hominids, who are the precursors of the present form of human race. Modern Man: Modern man is the subspecies of Homo sapiens, which include all living humans. Early Man: The early man originated six million years ago. ... Early Man: The early man originated from apelike ancestors.

4 0
3 years ago
What was one reason the British were unsuccessful in the South?
viva [34]
The answer is A sorry if I’m wrong
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the world bank's stated goal?
Art [367]
Comprises two institutions: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), and the International Development Association (IDA). The World Bank is a component of the World Bank Group, which is part of the United Nations system. The World Bank's stated official goal is the reduction of poverty.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Effects of the pearl harbor bombing
    7·1 answer
  • Draw something you learned about the 2000s. <br><br> Any ideas what I should draw?<br><br> 12 POINTS
    13·1 answer
  • What legislation helped to shift power back to congress in 1974
    14·1 answer
  • How did the tarrif of 1816 influence sectional interest within the united states
    11·1 answer
  • A powerful committee of the U.S. Senate charged with finding ways to raise federal revenues is the
    6·2 answers
  • Whats the difference in voting in the US than in other countries
    6·1 answer
  • How was the Chancellorsville victory turned into defeat
    12·1 answer
  • Did the U.N. Ban the use of the atomic bomb after testing it in July 1945?
    8·1 answer
  • What things did the incas use to make their houses
    9·2 answers
  • The era of group migration lasted between 1820 and 1880. Which country experienced a major potato famine and sent the most settl
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!