This is speculation, so please get a second opinion.
I think it's c, because the adults, in this passage, are teaching children how to behave, and therefore a and b are ruled out. d could have possibly been one, but I think that it would not be, because the adults are not explicitly setting clear examples for their children.
Again, you should get a second answer before you answer this.
Answer:
Dear Mr. /Miss...
I am curious about your favorite candy! Do you prefer Chocolate or Gummy bears, Chips or Candy Corn, Soda or Energy drinks? There are so many different candy's that it is almost impossible to keep track, but not just with the quantity with the quality too! You may ask what my point is. It is simple : We are checking every day on quality: Is the car good? Does my phone have a good capacity? But why don't we care how good the Candy's actually are for us? In one cane of Coke there are 17 cubes of sugar (if there is even real sugar in there, because some companies are using substitutes!) and in one flavor of gummy bears aren't even real fruits used! Why don't we care about food and especially about candy's?
Thank you for your time and have a nice day!
...
Explanation:
Hope that helps!
The attack on fort Sumter is the unofficial start to the war, but the conflict began far before with sectional tension coming to a head over slavery resulting in the south's secession. The first official battle was the one fought at bull run
Answer: Yes because it can be seen as a stress reliever and relaxing.
Many people don't have a photo identification. Requiring people to show a photo identification to vote would keep those without this type of identification from voting. Those who often don't have identification include elderly individuals who no longer drive and citizens living in high poverty areas where transportation is limited. They would be denied the chance to vote. Sociologist Mark Abernathy writes, "requiring photo identification in order to vote essentially eliminates a whole population of American voters. These voters are part of society, but they are denied a basic right guaranteed to all Americans over the age of eighteen. Elections are then determined by only a smallportion of the population, not the entire population" (page 820 of the article "Photo Identification Disenfranchisement"). Some people think this is not true. Ria Olberson, an economist at Alabaster University, states, "Few Americans are without drivers' licenses. Even if the license is expired or revoked, it still counts as photo identification. To claim that requiring identification disenfranchises a segment of the American population is simply inaccurate" (page 101). Olberson is just wrong! A lot of people don't have licenses because they either don't need them or they don't want them. Consider people living in major cities. They have no reason to get driver's licenses: public transportation. This extremely large group of people would be forced to obtain driver's licenses to participate in a process that they are guaranteed as citizens of the United States
