I don't know which passage you are referring to, but if these are the options: <span>A.Women are not given opportunities to put their skills to good use. B.Living and working in the Salinas Valley is too easy. C.Difficult times call for difficult measures. D.Loneliness leads to unwise choices.
The answer is probably A.
In this short story, the main character Elisa is a woman who has a creative potential, as well as strength and persistence, but she never gets a chance to put them to good use. She craves an opportunity to realize her potential, but there is none. All she ever does are chores and housework, so she invests all her creativity into nurturing her chrysanthemums. The stranger is quite an intriguing figure for her - if nothing else, because he is different from her husband. He inspires her.
One might also think that D is the right choice. But I don't believe so. This is not a moralistic story. The author doesn't reprimand Elisa for giving a little bit of her affection to the stranger. He understands her behavior.</span>
The Irony is that walter says, unless you have money to pay off people in this world, nothing will happen for you.... walter then loses his investment money.....
The option that best describes the use of rhetorical elements in the passage is the following:
B. Loaded language appeals to the audience's emotions.
Loaded language is the use of words that have strong connotations with the purpose of evoking feelings and emotions in the audience.
The author of the passage we are analyzing here uses loaded language when discussing the use of pesticides and the adaption and evolution of insects.
Words such as "war", "violent crossfire", "deadlier", and "triumphant vindication" help depict a horrible image of destruction. It sounds as if the author is describing a battle rather than the use of pesticides.
The author's intention is precisely that: to associate war and pesticides. That way, she can evoke certain emotions in her audience.
<u>No one likes war, killing, and death</u>. Thus, if that is what pesticides mean, <u>no one will like them either.</u>
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/18641687
Answer:
Explanation:
Dark chocolate, milk chocolate and white chocolate are 100% of what chocolate The Forever Chocolate Company makes.
The equivalent of 100% as a fraction is 
.
<u>White chocolate</u>
if 0.5 is white chocolate, this means 0.5 of 1
that is, 
=0.5 0r 
Therefore, half of the chocolate they make is white chocolate.
White chocolate represents 50%
They make 30% dark chocolate
<u>Milk chocolate</u>
Milk chocolate makes up the remaining,
100% - 80% = 20%
Milk chocolate represents 20%
Converting 20% to fraction:
= or 0.2
