Answer: It’s research the issues
Explanation:
The other answer is wrong
Answer:
Yes, the company is liable because Jamal was on his work route and took a minor detour to pick shirts he needed for work.
Explanation:
Generally what determines if the company is liable or not for a car accident, is if the employee was acting within the scope of his/her normal employment activities. In this case, even though Jamal took a break to pick up some shirts for work, he didn't deviate form his normal activities and not even from his normal work route. He was actually coming back from making a delivery.
It would have been different if he had gone to a different neighborhood or downtown just to pick the shirts. You must also consider that Jamal drives the delivery truck 10 hours a day, and that doesn't leave him a lot of spare time for his own personal activities, and this particular one was also related to his work.
This situation is similar to an accident happening when a truck driver is stopping to go to the bathroom or eating something while travelling.
Answer:
Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Contribution Margin:
= Total sales of the product - variable expenses
= $400,000 - $270,000
= $130,000
Avoidable fixed cost = Total fixed cost - Unavoidable fixed cost
= $160,000 - $ 70,000
= $90,000
Net Margin :
= Contribution Margin - Avoidable fixed expense
= $130,000 - $90,000
= $40,000
Hence, if product A is dropped, the company's overall net operating income would decrease by $40,000 per year.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A (government debt owed to individuals in foreign countries).
Explanation:
- This applies to interest earned from some kind of creditor or outside nation, this must be repaid throughout the commodity these were invested in.
- External debt may be collected through foreign banking institutions, from global banking organizations including the World Bank, respectively., as well as from sovereign governments.
Some other alternatives given don't apply to the cases in question. So answer A is a good one.