Answer:
Expected return = 28%
Explanation:
given data
invests $4,000
share = 200
return = 24%
and
invests = $2000
share = 100
return = 18%
and
invest = $4,000
share = 400
return = 28%
to find out
expected return on this portfolio
solution
we know total investment is
Total investment = 4000+2000+4000
Total investment = 10000
and
Wt. of Sand Corporation shares in the total portfolio= 
= 0.4
Wt. of Water Corporation shares in the total portfolio=
= 0.2
Wt. of Beach Corporation shares in the total portfolio= = 0.4
and
Expected return on the given portfolio is
Expected return = 0.4 × 24% + 0.4 × 18% + 0.4 × 28%
Expected return = 28%
If you have a VA service-connected disability rating of 10% or higher, you are eligible to receive a monthly compensation check from the VA. The monthly compensation payments vary by your disability rating—and if your rating is 30% or higher—the rates are increased, depending number of dependents you have filed on your claim.
Answer: $19,800
Explanation;
The Monopolist will maximize output at the point where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost because at this point all resources are being fully utilized.
Total Cost = Average Total Cost * Quantity produced
At the point where MR=MC, the quantity produced is 1,100 units.
The Average Total Cost tallying with this is $18 per unit.
Total Cost = 18 * 1,100
= $19,800
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
<span>"A. Improved morale and productivity." is not a benefit of safety and health programs. The morale levels have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not someone cuts their arm off because they didn't follow safety procedures. </span><span /><span>
</span>
