1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laila [671]
3 years ago
9

which option is one important source of public opinion personal background, survey's, the constitution, foreign policy

History
2 answers:
djyliett [7]3 years ago
6 0

Hi!

The option that is considered to be one important source of public opinion is: <em>B) Surveys</em>.

Explanation:

Surveys are a method that consists on gathering information from individuals. This information is collected through use of standardized procedures so that each participant is asked to answer the same questions. So, this is a source of gathering public opinions.

sweet-ann [11.9K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

surveys

Explanation:

I know because the main sources of public opinion is: interest groups, personal background, and mass media!

Also the correct definition of opinion polls is: surveys that ask people questions about specific topics, issues, or individuals!

And surveys is a type of mass media so it all makes sense! :>

You might be interested in
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 2
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

10th circuit

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Describe ways is which propaganda was used during the war in the United States
nevsk [136]

Answer:

hi kev! i hope this will help you1

Explanation:

RADIO

Radio was probably the most used form of propaganda during the war.  

The programs could be broadcast throughout the United States and around the world, which helped expand its reach.  

The programs that were popular during this time were the "Fireside Chat" of President Roosevelt, which was a radio program with him.  

The show was created in the 1930s, but made several of them during World War II.

MOVIES

At first, the films were quite neutral to war than anything else.

After Pearl Harbor, this changed completely, and the movies began to favor the Allied cause.

Most of the films produced during this time present some kind of aspect in times of war.

They were based on war or established themselves in an atmosphere of war.

This was true even if the movie had nothing to do with war.

POSTERS

The posters were widely used by the United States for propaganda during World War II.  

Most of the posters had a positive message, which differed from other countries and were designed by artists who were not paid for their work.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the French originally come to North America?
Phoenix [80]

They came to North America after French explorers came there and started a fur trade, which would be a good source of money for the French.

3 0
4 years ago
30 Points! Help!
Gala2k [10]
Hello!

Based on the cartoon, the artist's point of view is D) The Daily struggle of child laborers leads to the wealth of stockbrockers.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Huey long public life can be best characterized as one
    6·1 answer
  • How do Georgia's railroads help to create jobs in Georgia?
    6·1 answer
  • What caused the United States to join the Allies in fighting World War I?
    5·2 answers
  • Efforts are being made to improve the health of _______.
    8·2 answers
  • why did Lincoln say I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it
    8·1 answer
  • What is one way that the constitution protects the rights of us citizens ​
    14·1 answer
  • How did this reform have a positive or negative impact on American society?
    8·1 answer
  • Which was the only great European power that did not have a large standing army?
    11·2 answers
  • Your friend Ira describes the Hagia Sofia to you in great detail. It combines the structure of the earlier basilicas with a huge
    14·1 answer
  • Which is a common theme connecting the Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, and Common Sense?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!