1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Keith_Richards [23]
3 years ago
9

What were the terms of the proposal de colliers offered the British

History
1 answer:
o-na [289]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Louis Coulon, sieur de Villiers (17 August 1710 – 2 November 1757) was a French Canadian military officer during the French and Indian War (Seven Years' War). Perhaps his greatest claim to fame is the fact that he is the only military opponent to force George Washington to surrender.

Coulon was born into a prominent French Canadian family. His grandfather, Sieur Raoul-Guillaume Coulon, was a commandant in the French royal army.[1] He was the son of Nicolas Antoine Coulon de Villiers and Elizabeth Le Couturier.[2] Louis Coulon de Villiers entered the military in 1733. He had risen to the rank of captain by the outbreak of the French and Indian War and was assigned to Fort Duquesne.

His half-brother, Ensign Joseph Coulon de Jumonville, was killed by George Washington and his men after surrendering at the Battle of Jumonville Glen. Coulon sought justice and led an expedition to attack the British garrison at Fort Necessity under the command of George Washington.

On the morning of July 3, 1754, Coulon's troops attacked Fort Necessity (See Battle of the Great Meadows). By evening, the British had asked for terms of surrender. It was the only time in Washington's long military career when he surrendered to an enemy.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Do you think Texans had some valid reasons for seceeding from the Union? Explain why or why not.
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

I hope this help

Explanation:

The election of a Republican, Abraham Lincoln, to the presidency of the United States and fears that Republican control of the executive branch would threaten slavery and the traditional rights and liberties of Americans precipitated the secession crisis in Texas and elsewhere.

8 0
3 years ago
What mutual benefits did First Nations and Europeans derive from the fur trade?
Margaret [11]

Answer:

The Indigenous peoples were able to trade furs to the Europeans for things like food, money, clothing etc. And in turn through companies like Hudson's Bay the Europeans were able to sell the furs back in Europe for profit. The Europeans really liked beaver pelts especially for hats.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Please help me with this question!
Phantasy [73]

Answer:

A. It further divided the Northern and Southern states.

Explanation:

In the text it says,

"People in the south believed the law would force northerners to recognize the rights of southerners. Instead enforcement of the law convinced more people in the north of the evils of slavery."

This separates the Northern and Southern states even more.

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
As Chief Justice of the United States, John Marshall felt property rights should not be empowered made decisions that reflected
monitta

Answer:

As Chief Justice of the United States, John Marshall felt property rights should not be empowered.

Explanation:

As the longest serving Supreme Court of the United States, Marshall dominated the court for more than three decades and played an important role in the development of the American legal system. The most remarkable thing about this is that, particularly in the famous Marbury v. Madison judgment, he upheld the principle that federal courts are required to exercise the right to review. For example, alleged laws could be disregarded if they violate the Constitution. In this way, Marshall was able to anchor the judiciary in the United States as an independent and influential branch of the state. In addition, the Marshall Supreme Court issued a number of important decisions with regard to federalism. It touched on the balance of power between the federal government and the states during the early years of the nation. In particular, he repeatedly confirmed the supremacy of federal law on state-level laws. He also supported a broad interpretation of the so-called enumerated powers.

Some of his decisions received little support from the general public. Nevertheless, Marshall worked on the development of the third branch of the federal government and strengthened the federal level in the name of the Constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
What were the different approaches to colonization taken by the spanish, french and british empires?
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

Spanish developed extractive industries in precious metals, whereas English were more likely to establish economies based on trade. More royal control over Spanish colonies than English because English were settled to escape political and religious persecution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the "Lightning war?"
    15·1 answer
  • The rich man never dances badly,whose prove is this?
    9·1 answer
  • What steps must of a historian take to evaluate historical evidence
    11·1 answer
  • What was the result of FDR's court-packing scheme?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following was part of the Fugitive Slave Act passed in 1850? A. Private citizens had to assist in the capture of
    10·1 answer
  • What was one of the rights or protections guaranteed by the English Bill of Rights?
    6·1 answer
  • What kind of self government did the early nationalists demand?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the most common ecosystem found in the south?
    11·1 answer
  • What are the 3 main jobs of the vice president?
    14·2 answers
  • When was rocket technology develop
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!