Answer:
Yes, Dudley and Stephens should be tried for murder. ... Also, in the country in which they were tried, the law states that “any person who deliberately takes the life of another is guilty for murder.”
Answer: 3/4 (38 out of 50)
Explanation: After being officially proposed, either congress or a national convention of the states, a constitutional amendment must then be ratified by 38 out of 50 of the states.
Answer:
The given statement and information is correct about the 10 percent rule.
Explanation:
In ecology, the 10 percent rule is just not a rule but a fact which says that when an organism is consumed by another organism in a food chain or food web the energy that is stored by the higher tropic level organism is only 10 percent of the amount of total stored energy in the organism consumed.
Rest 90 percent of energy lost in the process, due to cellular respiration or transformation or incomplete digestion. This rule is presented by Raymond Lindeman.
Answer: Your question is incomplete. Please let me assume this to be your question;
A student watches the teacher fold a napkin, the student went home and helped the mother to fold napkin for her baby sister. Through what learning process did the students learn to fold the napkin? Correct Answer(s) Drag appropriate answer(s) here
a. vicarious conditioning
b. negative reinforcement
c. verbal instructions alone
d. observational learning modeling
ANSWER: Option a and option d are most correct option. Vicarious conditioning and observational learning model.
Explanation: vicarious conditioning is an Observational learning model, were one learn by observation. That means option a and option d means the same thing and can be used interchangeably. In vicarious learning, communication is non verbal and uninvolved, as the person learns by only observing the person perform a task.
Because the student has learnt how to fold a napkin by only watching the teacher folding the napkin, it is an Observational learning.
Answer:
Explanation:
Forced off the land, millions of peasants came into the towns, or worked in rural factories and mines. In the last half-century of the old regime the Empire's urban population grew from 7 to 28 million people.
Factory conditions were terrible. According to Count Witte, the Finance Minister in charge of Russia's industrialization until 1905, the worker 'raised on the frugal habits of rural life' was 'much more easily satisfied' than his counterpart in Europe or North America, so that 'low wages appeared as a fortunate gift to Russian enterprise'.
There was little factory legislation to protect labour. The two most important factory laws - one in 1885 prohibiting the night-time employment of women and children, and the other in 1897 restricting the working day to eleven and a half hours - had to be wrenched from the government. Small workshops were excluded from the legislation, although they probably employed the majority of the country's workforce, and certainly most of its female contingent.
Shopfloors were crammed with dangerous machinery: there were frequent accidents. Yet most workers were denied a legal right to insurance and, if they lost an eye or limb, could expect no more than a few roubles' compensation. Workers' strikes were illegal. There were no legal trade unions until 1905. Many factory owners treated workers like their serfs.
Russian workers were the most strike-prone in Europe during the 1900s. Three-quarters of the factory workforce went on strike in the revolutionary years of 1905-6.
