The main reason is that t<span>he Union had strong leadership in the West.
</span>
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Answer: Transportation, new immigrants, little government influence, poor and dangerous working conditions, wide gap between rich and poor, and overcrowded cities, sanitation. Which reform movement had already developed in rural areas, demonstrating the
Explanation:
In theory with radio or Morse code light messages, they could coordinate attacks and such, probably with radio<span />
They would probably say we did good with what we had. Although many people don't realize it technology increases every 4-6 months. So they could think that or think that we could have done better. They also might think that our economy might have affected the results that were made. It really depends on their perspective.
