Answer:
Answer:
Explanation:
Too much interference by other countries:
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT- The overseas countries with a strong manufacturing / industrial base would prefer to keep you as a commodity provider and buyer of their finished goods only .eg. If you are buying USD$Billions worth of arms and ammunition from overseas countries, it is not in their interest that you develop a strong/independent defense manufacturing capability. They achieve this by further corrupting decision makers and rulers in strict violation of their own Anti - Corruption laws. Writer Dr. Shashi Tharoor’s essay “Inglorious Empire” delves into these aspects somewhat in India’s context.
RELIGIO-POLITICAL - A more detailed examination in the context of India by Arvind Kumar - Global Economic Theories - A Ploy To Loot India | Arvind Kumar | History Of Economic Systems
ECONOMIC & SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT - By fomenting discord using funds channelled via Religious, social or NGO’s to those who will push the respective agendas of overseas countries. Writer John Perkins writes and speaks about this extensively in “Confessions of an Economic Hitman” . New Confessions of an Economic Hitman
GLOBAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES - Some of the far out /wilder allegations are from British writers such as David Icke about various secret societies, apparently with disproportionate control over human destiny. David Icke Reveals Who Controls the World!
DEFINITION OF “DEVELOPMENT” MAY BE DIFFERENT - Despite the existence of metrics like the HDI by globalist agenda organisations/NGO’s. The environmental collapse of the world and non-human species of plants and animals proves that the HDI is “insufficient” for the world. Therefore a country like Bhutan decided that their main metric for “development” was not to create concrete and glass soul-less cities, destruction of families such that most people over 40 live alone with a dog or cat for company and a dog-eat-dog society mainly focused on GDP. They choose GHI (Gross Happiness Index), clean air, forests and food uncontaminated by chemicals. Who is to say that their choices are worse than so called “developed” countries??
Yes, many factors must be considered before concluding that authoritative parents are effective in raising up well-behaved children. However, the fact that kids are able to submit to authorities at home give them that quality that can only be found in well-behaved children, the "submission" ability. If they are able to submit to their parents, they are able to submit to any authority placed on them.
Answer:
Plough is one of the popular farm equipment used to turn the layer of soil, It is also known as primary tillage implements. ... Traditional Ploughs drawn by oxen and horses, but in modern agriculture are drawn by tractors. Traditional plough made with the combination of wooden, iron or steel frame, and blades.
Answer:
Market
Explanation:
Here are a brief difference between the four systems.
Market : People/the Private sector control the supply/demand along with factors of production
Command : Government control the supply/demand along with factors of production
Mixed : Both the Government and the people control the supply/demand along with factors of production
Traditional : Traditions control the supply/demand along with factors of production
Under the Full market economy, people have the full freedom to determine the outcome in the market. The resources such as land, materials, and skills will be privately owned and the government has no influence within the market.
One advantage of this system is that the winners of the competition in the market will accumulate high amount of wealth in relatively fast period. But on the downside, lack government involvement often turns the competition dirty and those who hurt other individuals in the process wouldn't receive any repercussions.
Answer:
Thanks to the internet, each person with marginal views can see that he’s not alone. And when these people find one another via social media, they can do things — create memes, publications and entire online worlds that bolster their worldview, and then break into the mainstream.
Without social media, social, ethical, environmental and political ills would have minimal visibility. Increased visibility of issues has shifted the balance of power from the hands of a few to the masses.
Explanation:
