All categories

3 years ago

The tables below show four sets of data:

Mathematics

2 answers:

Lena [83]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

it is set a

Step-by-step explanation:

vovangra [49]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Hence, the set that represent a negative linear association between x and y is:

Set A.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given 4 sets of data as:

Set A

x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

y 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

Set B

x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

y 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Set C

x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

y 8 6 5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 2

Set D

x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

y 1 2.5 2.5 3 4 5 6 8 9

We are asked to determine the set which represent negative linear association between x and y?

Clearly in Set B and Set D the values of y keeps on increasing as the value of x increases; hence they both represent a positive linear association between x and y.
In set C the relationship is non-linear though it is negative.
Clearly in Set A we could see that the the y is related to x as:

y=11-x or y= -x+11.

Hence, clearly we could see that the relationship is linear and also negative as the value of y keeps on decreasing with increasing x.

Hence, the set that represent a negative linear association between x and y is:

Set A.

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer.

Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

5 4/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Convert a mixed number 2 19

to a improper fraction: 2 1/9 = 2 19 = 2 · 9 + 19 = 18 + 19 = 199

To find new numerator:

a) Multiply the whole number 2 by the denominator 9. Whole number 2 equally 2 * 99 = 189

b) Add the answer from previous step 18 to the numerator 1. New numerator is 18 + 1 = 19

c) Write a previous answer (new numerator 19) over the denominator 9.

Two and one ninth is nineteen ninths

Add: 19

9+ (-29) = 19 + (-2)9= 179

For adding, subtracting, and comparing fractions, it is suitable to adjust both fractions to a common (equal, identical) denominator. The common denominator you can calculate as the least common multiple of the both denominators - LCM(9, 9) = 9. In practice, it is enough to find the common denominator (not necessarily the lowest) by multiplying the denominators: 9 × 9 = 81. In the next intermediate step the fraction result cannot be further simplified by canceling.

In words - nineteen ninths plus minus two ninths = seventeen ninths.

Conversion a mixed number 3 59

to a improper fraction: 3 5/9 = 3 59= 3 · 9 + 59= 27 + 51 = 329

To find new numerator:

a) Multiply the whole number 3 by the denominator 9. Whole number 3 equally 3 * 99 = 279

b) Add the answer from previous step 27 to the numerator 5. New numerator is 27 + 5 = 32

c) Write a previous answer (new numerator 32) over the denominator 9.

Three and five ninths is thirty-two ninths

Add: the result of step No. 2 + 32

9= 179+ 329 = 17 + 329 = 499

In words - seventeen ninths plus thirty-two ninths = forty-nine ninths.

7 0

3 years ago

For the given function, x can have what value?

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

x cannot be -4,-3, or 13

x can be anything else

Step-by-step explanation:

There are infinitely many values x can take where the relation above will be a function.

For it to be a function, you just need to make sure each x is only assigned one y value.

So x couldn't be -4 because it would by assigned to y=2 and y=0.

x couldn't be -3 because it would be assigned to y=1 and y=0.

x couldn't be 13 because it would be assigned to y=5 and y=0.

So as long as x is not chosen to be -4,-3, or 13 your relation here is a function.

5 0

3 years ago

Is is 6 2/7 rational or irrational

steposvetlana [31]

Step-by-step explanation:

6 2/7is rational

-19is rational but next I dont know

6 0

3 years ago

Hey can anyone help with this question?

schepotkina [342]

(AB)^2 + (2 m)^2 = (8 m)^2, or

(AB)^2 + 4 m^2 = 64 m^2, or (AB)^2 = 60 m^2.

Taking the square root of both sides, (length of AB) = + 2sqrt(15) (answer)

7 0

3 years ago

123.5652 to the nearest thousand

ycow [4]

Answer:

Hi there!

The correct answer will be: 123.565

Step-by-step explanation:

Any time they ask you to round to the nearest thousand, it means there will be three digits behind the decimal

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers