The argument that is most likely to have influenced the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school is A. The Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the fundamental rights of a person that is protected by law to make his own choices.
Hence, we can see that based on the original decision by the lower courts, they said the school was right to suspend the students, but the main argument that overturned this decision is that fact that the Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. resilience of the American people.
Explanation:
the author clearly portraits the king as the bad guy here, and sounds as though he finds what the Americans in Boston did to be funny. "they had a grand tea party" he obviously likes the idea of what they did. and " the people from Maine to Georgia were all of one mind." he's showing that everyone in the 13 colonies was prepared to stand up and fight for what they believed was right.
Answer:
B. men and women adhering to traditional gender roles
Explanation:
The text above shows a situation in which men and women play traditional gender roles. These roles indicate that certain activities can only be performed by women while other activities can only be performed by men.
We can see the traditional gender roles in the text when we see that women are in charge of housework and serving men. The role of "serving" is related to women, when it comes to the exhibition of traditional gender roles.
Your correct answer is C.