Hello! :)
West Virginia and Louisiana are two of the largest crude oil producers in the U. S.
Hope this helped and I hope I answered in time!
Good luck!
~ Destiny ^_^
If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.
An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.
An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.
Know more about uncogent argument here
brainly.com/question/13445406
#SPJ4
Answer: The correct answer is : C) the original cost plus installation
Explanation: MACRS (The Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System) is a depreciation method used for tax purposes. The MACRS depreciation method requires use of the half-year convention. Assets are assumed to be acquired in the middle of the year and only one-half of the first year's depreciation is recovered in the first year.
Answer:
Power
Explanation:
According to the text, <u>Power </u>refers to an individual’s ability to influence others to do what the individual wants, as well as an individual’s ability to resist the influence attempts of others.
Power is defined as the ability to influence the actions and decisions of others.
Answer:
d. conventional
Explanation:
Kohlberg did some studies on morality and proposed a theory on moral development.
Kohlberg defined three different levels of morality (and each level consists in 2 stages). These levels are:
- preconventional,
- conventional and
- postconventional
In the preconventional level, the person's morality is externally controlled and therefore acts based on what the punishment or reward will be (1st stage) or based on how good will it be for him/her to act in some way (2nd stage)
The conventional level stages also have to to with external controls but now the person thinks in function of ensure positive relationships and societal order. The third stage here depends on the approval of others. The fourth stage has to do with accepting rules because they preserve the society order and functioning.
The postconventional level stages are defined in more abstract principles or values. The 5th stage sees the world as a place with different values that must be respected. Finally the 6th stage is based in universal ethical abstract principles.
In this example, Candice is presented with a moral dilemma, she said the person should take a course of action that will ensure that the community will not disapprove of the person's action. We can see that<u> her response has to do with external controls, specifically with the approval of the community as a whole. </u>We know that in the conventional level, the 3rd stage has to do with the approval of others. Therefore, Candice's response reflects Lawrence Kohlberg's conventional level of moral development.
