Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
It's the other way around. Their research shows that when the canadians put in the same situation, their judgement regarding acts of violence actually similar and consistent with the judgement made by the americans.
(this research finding is a little bit surprising because Canadians are more well known to have a more polite and gentle culture)
In general , their judgement regarding acts of violence can be influenced by their primal human instincts.
For example, the research showed that:
- both canadians and Americans overwhelmingly approved that acts of violence are justifiable if being done toward people who are broken into their house.
- Both Canadians and Americans overwhelmingly disapproved of acts of violence toward group of protesters.
I think it is either a or b
I hope this kinda helps you
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. becomes concerned with future generations" According to Erik Erikson, the first personality challenge adults should experience is whether or not an individual <span>becomes concerned with future generations</span>
Answer: High magnitude of consequences
Explanation:
The scam had a high magnitude of consequences as its effect had an impact on both the firm and individuals that worked in the firm.
