The answer would be valid.
Hope this helps you! :)
- Jujufire
I believe the answer is: Because company stores didn't sell goods to workers who were in a union
And the working sites usually located far away from the metropolitan area (such as on top of the mountain or in the middle of the desert). This provide the workers with no other choice but to leave the union if they want to be a part of the work forces and live in company towns.
The answer in the space provided is the chief of staff. The
chief of staff is responsible of leading a certain organization in which he or
she is the one responsible of having to deal with certain issues in support of the
one that it protects.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
