<span>aim to solve the monarchys financial crisis</span>
Answer: Yes the colonist were justified in the violence towards the British because of all of the hardships and violence the British committed against the colonist. From the Stamp Act to the Townshend Act, to the Boston massacre were all things that led up to the colonist being fed up with the tyrant British king so they revolted to break away from Britian's grip.
Explanation: Hope this helps ;)
Your answer would be A because the Emancipation Proclamation only freed the slaves in the south until the South decided to come back to the US.
Answer:
the British preferred to use local institutions to control subject populations.
Explanation:
British colonialism was established differently in places that had already established their own institutions, such as African countries. Although these countries already had institutions before the arrival of the English, it was necessary that the British empire dominate these institutions, or to give them up and form new institutions. However, the British empire understood that dominating existing institutions would be something cheaper and more advantageous and that it would establish an efficient dominance, so it was done, that is, unlike other European nations, England decided to use local institutions to control populations subdued.
Answer:
The Second Punic War was fought between the Romans and the Carthaginians between 218 and 201 BC. The Romans then went on to a several-year war of wear and tear, gradually destroying or neutralizing the allies and main colonies of Carthage, and finally, under the leadership of Publius Cornelius Scipionus Africano, they won the Battle of Zama. This war definitely decided the struggle of both cities for dominance in the Mediterranean in favor of Rome.
Due to the complete destruction of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BC and the long-term hegemony of the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean, no historical sources have been preserved describing the course of the war and its background from a Carthaginian or truly neutral point of view. Historians can therefore rely only on the works of Greek and Roman ancient authors and must therefore interpret them very carefully.
