Answer:$2 billion in World War I bonuses, and then overrode Roosevelt's veto of the measure.
Explanation:$2 billion in World War I bonuses, and then overrode Roosevelt's veto of the measure.
Answer:
D) judges are able to strike down any laws they feel are immoral.
Explanation:
None of these are truly correct.
Federal Judges, especially in the Supreme Court, are nominated by the President, but needs to be approved by the two houses of congress. They are also in court for life, unless they break the constitution. These Judges, while they have their own beliefs, are supposed to be "3rd party", however, evidently the judges will rule based on what they believe is right.
A) is not exactly right, because administrations can nominate judges when there is a vacant space, either from the death of a judge or the judge stepping down.
B) is incorrect, because the judges are supposed to rule based on how the law affects the constitutional rights of the citizens of the country. They neither have the obligation to vote Democratic nor Republican.
C) is incorrect, because they are only able to nominate workers who can help them by hiring them. They do not nominate anybody.
D) is technically incorrect, but is your best answer. They do not strike down laws that "they feel are immoral", but that they strike down laws that break the constitution in any shape or form.
~
5/8 of 24 is 15 so 24-15 = 9
1/4 of 24 is 6 so 9 - 6 = 3
So there's 3 ounces left in the bucket.
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
As a colonist, if I had been on the French side, I would have felt disconsolate for having to face loss in the war; if I had been on the side of the Indians that were allied to both the side, I would have felt anger; if I had been on the side of British, I would have felt proud for winning the war.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
The French and Indian war went on for 7 long years and resulted in the British winning it. In this war, different groups of Native Americans were allied to both sides. But at the end of the war, they got nothing for their contribution.
