Answer:

General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Algebra I</u>
- Exponential Rule [Rewrite]:

<u>Calculus</u>
[Area] Limits of Riemann's Sums - Integrals
Integration Rule [Reverse Power Rule]:
Integration Rule [Fundamental Theorem of Calculus 1]: 
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<u />
<u />
<u />
<u>Step 2: Find Area</u>
- [Integral] Set up area:

- [Integral] Rewrite:

- [Integral] Reverse Power Rule:

- [Area] Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:

Topic: Calculus
Unit: Basic Integration/Riemann Sums
Book: College Calculus 10e
The answer to this question would be the last choice (this data has no outliers)
Explanation: The reason for this is that an outlier is basically any number or value that kind of stands off or is very separated from a set of data.
For example, if I had the numbers 1,2,3,2,9,5,7,5,8,4 and 47, 47 would definitely be an outlier as it's significantly greater than the rest of the data.
The data shown in your question doesn't vary a lot though, (it's contained within a range of 65 and 80- no number seems to be radically different).
Answer= H (-1, -4)
Explanation= 6(-1) - 5(-4) = 14
(-6) + (20) = 14
14=14 * it works !
GOODLUCK!
The actual probability of having odd is 3/6=1/2
so no of odds theoretically is 250
but it is 325
so, experimental is higher than theoretical
so answer is B !
and you can go for that !
it would be 9.93300
so 3 decimal places because the zeros don't count