Firmly. The majority of adverbs end in ly.
Answer:
It asserts that African people are no less human than white settlers.
It contends that white settlers should treat African people more respectfully.
Explanation:
In Samuel Sewall's pamphlet "The Selling of Joseph", the author argues his case against the<u> discriminatory act of practicing slavery</u>. This pamphlet was also the very first anti-slavery text in New England.
As seen in the given excerpt, Sewall began to fiercely debate that the <em>"Ethiopians, as black as they are, [are] the Sons and Daughters of the First Adam"</em> establishing the fact that they are also a descendant of the first man on earth. And if they are from Adam, they are also the same as the whites who are also the descendant of the same Adam that God created and put in the Garden of Eden. So, the skin color of a person does not matter and it definitely does not determine what life he is to lead or be given. He also has the right to live the same life the whites live.
So, <u>Judge Samuel Sewall's assertion and his persuasion are that the African people are the same as the white settlers and that they have the right to be treated with respect too. </u>
Answer:
Graffiti should be considered a crime. If someone calls vandalizing other peoples property art, then that person is wrong. Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own , most of the time graffiti is disrespectful, and it is very costly to the community.
Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own. If someone was to vandalize another persons home with graffiti written on it, that person would feel very disrespected. Although sometimes graffiti is beautiful, we would not want a person to vandalize our property and have them call it art. It would be fine if a graffiti artist were to draw on their own property because it belongs to them. It is very disrespectful for someone to draw on someone else's property without permission. Which brings me to my second point.
Most of the time graffiti is disrespectful. The artist have no concern on what they draw that might offend other people who have the chance to see it. Graffiti artist are truly gifted, so this means they can make their art look very realistic. Someone might say, if someone does not want to see it then they should not look. Whoever might say that is very wrong. Graffiti artist tend to draw art on almost anything that they can. This means they draw it for the public to see, whether the public wishes to see it or not. Some graffiti artist do not care what they write, but parents do. A parents does not want to walk with their child somewhere crowded, and see something inappropriate drawn or written for their child to see. Which brings me to my third and final point.
Graffiti is very costly to the community to get it removed. That is why graffiti artist should not draw offensive things, but they do anyway and the community has to pay to get it removed. This is just like the app Instagram. If someone were to post something offensive towards the public, someone would report it, so it could get removed because what they saw were either offensive to them, their children, or they were thinking about everyone else that might come across that post. This relates to graffiti. If the community were to leave something that were offensive to the community there would be problems, not small problems, but big enough problems that could get people hurt.
Although graffiti is a wonderful thing to see, it should be called a crime because it can corrupt young minds and cause problems.
Explanation:
Sorry if this is not what you were looking for!
I think A) Use an outline is the best choice.
