Answer:
We see that Prog A will give an annual CF of 75%*$6000 = $4500
Prog B will give annual CF of 95%*$6000 = $5700
Disc Rate Kd = 20%
So PV of Annuity of $1 for 5 yrs with Kd = 20% is 2.9906
So NPV of Prog A = CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -12000+2.9906*4500 = $1,458
So NPV of Prog B= CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -20000+2.9906*5700 = $(2,954)
So Prog A is more effective as it gives a Positive NPV
Answer:
$4,050
Explanation:
Grey has $4,500 for shopping.
She spent 90% while on shopping.
The amount spent = 90/100 x $4500
=0.9 x $4,500
=$4,050
This is called an occupational stress. <span> This comes from work, which is stress related.</span><span>
</span><span>There are many factors why people have occupational stress. T</span><span>he load of work, pressure, economic conditions at work and layoffs can lead to such stress. Stress can lead to poor health and behavioral changes.</span><span>
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
0.1046 or 10.46%
Explanation:
The computation of the sustainable growth rate is shown below:
The Sustainable growth rate of the firm is
= Return on Equity × ( 1 - Dividend Payout Ratio )
where,
Dividend Payout Ratio = 30%
And,
Return on equity is
= Net Income ÷ Shareholder 's equity
= $3660 ÷ $ 24,500
= 0.14938
So,
Sustainable growth rate is
= 0.14938 × (1 - 30%)
= 0.1046 or 10.46%
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
