Could a photograph be considered a primary source. Why or why not

Social Studies

2 answers:

olganol [36]2 years ago

5 0

It depends because of the person was there then yes but if the person was not there then no.

ruslelena [56]2 years ago

4 0

Yes, because it's a picture taken of the event. You know a secondary source is something that DID NOT take part of or witness the event, so a Primary source is something that DID take part of, or witness the event. So a picture would be a Primary source.

You might be interested in

Our sense of familiarity and comfort within our own cultures is known as _____.

stiv31 [10]

Answer:

The correct answer would be Embodied Ethnocentrism. Our sense of familiarity and comfort within our own culture is known as Embodied Ethnocentrism.

Explanation:

When a person feels close association, ease and comfort within his own cultures, this is called as Embodied Ethnocentrism.

For example when a person wears his traditional cultural dresses in his culture and sees other wearing the same type of dresses, he feels comfortable in his attire, whereas if he is in another culture and is wearing his traditional dress and sees others wearing their traditional dresses, he would surely feel discomfort. So this feeling of being familiar and at ease is called as the embodied ethnocentrism.

4 0

3 years ago

Can you please help me with these 3 questions on World History???

Sergeu [11.5K]

There is constitution and the second is the Wilson

7 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is true of social class?

inn [45]

Answer:

Its either A or C

Explanation:

back in the days people where in a system called the Cast System in India. only the class that you were born in that is what you where. It was rare for someone to change their class if it was allowed. So im more leaning towards A

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You may remember that fresh water is the only type of water humans and animals can drink. For this reason, it is essential to li

Inga [223]

3% is the answnsjsnsnskeu

8 0

3 years ago

Who was Pratap Singh shah? Why couldn't he continue the unification for a long?

Liula [17]

Pratap Singh Shah was the king of the Nepal. He couldn't continue the unification so long because of the political obstacles.

<h3>When did Pratap Singh Shah became king?</h3>

Pratap Singh Shah became the ruler of Nepal in 1775. Pratap Singh Shah ruled for for 36 months, from 1777 to 1779, before passing away at the age of 26 from natural causes. Rana Bahadur Shah, his two-year-old son, succeeded him.

He couldn't unify the territories of the nation because he did not actively participated in the process of the unification like his father who was greatly involved and political crises also didn't allowed to do so.

Learn more about unification here:

brainly.com/question/4979723

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago