Court precedents are used in case of having no clear interpretation of the law for a particular case. President's precedents are simply acts performed by a President in a similar situation.
Explanation:
<u>Court precedents serve as an alternate to written laws when the existing guided laws are not suitable or simply not enough for a particular situation that arises.</u>
For this, the court can refer to a previous judgement as basis for their own judgement. <u>Thus, court precedents are enforceable by law.</u>
<u>Precedents set by a President serve at best, as guidelines.</u>
They are simply acts performed by a previous President when met with a similar situation.
A claim which is not defensible is saying that: D. George W. Bush is not as talented as his father, George H. W. Bush.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim simply refers to a statement that is used by a writer or speaker to prove, substantiate, defend and support an argument. Thus, it's an assertive statement that is expressed by a writer, so as to prove that an argument is either true or real.
In this scenario, an indefensible claim is saying that George W. Bush is not as talented as his father, George H. W. Bush because it is actually a proven statement of fact.
Read more on claims here: brainly.com/question/22676015
#SPJ1
Answer:
D)They believed that Lincoln would press for the abolition of slavery.
The answers is a b c d e f e
