The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
The statement above defines the concept of <em>"Whole Community Integration"</em>, which is an approach that incorporates all levels of government participants and engages the whole community with programs to better understand the needs of each community and thus determining better planning, development, and improvement accordingly.
Asia. I looked in my World History textbook.
